Home
home

Samsung Exynos 9611: Full Review, Performance, and Comparisons with Snapdragon & MediaTek


The Samsung Exynos 9611 is a mid-range processor widely used in Samsung's Galaxy smartphones. 

It was introduced as a successor to the Exynos 9610, featuring slight improvements in AI processing, camera capabilities, and efficiency.

With fierce competition from Qualcomm Snapdragon and MediaTek, many users wonder how Exynos 9611 stacks up against other mid-range and flagship processors. 

In this article, we will provide an in-depth review, compare it with Snapdragon 675, Snapdragon 855, MediaTek Helio G90, and analyze its benchmark performance to help you decide if it's a good choice for your smartphone.

Samsung Exynos 9611: Full Review, Performance, and Comparisons with Snapdragon & MediaTek
Samsung Exynos 9611: Full Review, Performance, and Comparisons with Snapdragon & MediaTek


Exynos 9611: Specifications & Features

1. CPU Architecture

  • Manufacturing Process: 10nm FinFET (Good power efficiency)
  • CPU Cores: Octa-core (8 cores)
    • 4x Cortex-A73 cores at 2.3 GHz (for high performance)
    • 4x Cortex-A53 cores at 1.7 GHz (for power efficiency)
  • Performance Type: Balanced for daily tasks but not for flagship-level gaming

2. GPU (Graphics Processing Unit)

  • Mali-G72 MP3 GPU (Supports mid-range gaming but struggles in heavy graphics tasks)
  • Supports Full HD+ (FHD+) resolution
  • Lacks support for high refresh rates (90Hz or 120Hz displays)

3. AI & Camera Processing

  • Neural Processing Unit (NPU): Improves AI-based tasks
  • Camera Support: Up to 64 MP single camera or 48 MP dual cameras
  • Video Recording: 4K at 30fps

4. Connectivity & Network

  • 4G LTE support (No 5G compatibility)
  • Wi-Fi 5, Bluetooth 5.0, and FM Radio support
  • No support for Wi-Fi 6 or latest Bluetooth 5.2

AnTuTu Benchmark & Performance Score

Exynos 9611 Antutu Benchmark Score:

  • Scores 180,000 - 190,000 points, which is mid-range performance
  • Struggles against newer Snapdragon and MediaTek competitors

Comparison with Other Processors on AnTuTu

Processor AnTuTu Score
Snapdragon 855 450,000+ 
Snapdragon 720G 280,000+
Snapdragon 730G 270,000+
MediaTek Helio G90 250,000+
Snapdragon 675 210,000+
Exynos 9611 180,000 - 190,000 

Verdict:

The Exynos 9611 lags behind Snapdragon 675, 720G, and MediaTek G90 in raw power. It is not ideal for intensive gaming but performs decently for everyday multitasking, social media, and basic apps.

Gaming Performance: Can Exynos 9611 Handle Heavy Games?

Popular Games & FPS (Frames Per Second) Performance

Game Graphics Settings FPS on Exynos 9611 Performance
PUBG Mobile Smooth + Ultra 40 FPS ✅ Playable
Call of Duty Mobile Medium Settings 45 FPS ✅ Smooth
Genshin Impact Low Settings 25-30 FPS ❌ Struggles
Asphalt 9 High Settings 30 FPS Average
BGMI Medium Settings 40 FPS ✅ Acceptable

Verdict:

The Mali-G72 MP3 GPU struggles with heavy games like Genshin Impact. It can handle PUBG, Call of Duty, and Asphalt 9 at medium to low settings, but Snapdragon 720G, 730G, and MediaTek G90T perform significantly better.

Comparison: Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon & MediaTek

1. Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 675: Which is Better?

✅ Snapdragon 675 Advantages:

  • Better CPU (Kryo 460 cores) than Cortex-A73 in Exynos 9611
  • Stronger GPU (Adreno 612) for gaming
  • Higher AnTuTu score (210,000 vs. 190,000)

❌ Exynos 9611 Advantages:

  • Better power efficiency (10nm vs 11nm)
  • Better AI processing & camera support (64MP vs 48MP on Snapdragon 675)

🏆 Winner: Snapdragon 675 is overall better in performance.

2. Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 855

✅ Snapdragon 855 Wins in Every Category:

  • 7nm architecture vs 10nm (better efficiency)
  • Triple the power (450,000+ AnTuTu vs 190,000)
  • Superior Adreno 640 GPU for gaming

🏆 Winner: Snapdragon 855 is FAR superior.

3. Exynos 9611 vs MediaTek Helio G90

✅ Helio G90 Advantages:

  • Better gaming GPU (Mali-G76 vs Mali-G72)
  • Higher AnTuTu score (250,000 vs. 190,000)
  • Better multi-core performance

❌ Exynos 9611 Advantages:

  • More power-efficient
  • Better Samsung software optimization

🏆 Winner: Helio G90 is better for gaming & performance.

4. Exynos 9611 vs Snapdragon 720G

✅ Snapdragon 720G Advantages:

  • Better performance (280,000 AnTuTu vs 190,000)
  • Adreno 618 GPU beats Mali-G72 MP3
  • Smoother gaming & app loading times

🏆 Winner: Snapdragon 720G is much better.

Power Efficiency & Battery Life

The 10nm FinFET design of Exynos 9611 makes it power-efficient compared to older 14nm or 12nm processors. However, Snapdragon 720G and 730G (8nm) are even more efficient.

Battery Performance in Real-World Usage

Usage Type Battery Drain per Hour
Gaming (PUBG) 🔋 18-22% per hour
Streaming (YouTube 1080p) 🔋 8-12% per hour
Standby Mode 🔋 2-3% per hour

📌 Verdict: Battery life is decent but not as efficient as newer processors.

Supported Devices with Exynos 9611

The Exynos 9611 powers several Samsung Galaxy A and M series phones, including:

  • Galaxy A50s, A51, M30s, M31, M21

🔹 Software Updates:

  • Samsung has started limiting long-term updates for Exynos 9611-powered devices.
  • Future Android updates beyond Android 13 may not be supported.

Final Verdict: Is Exynos 9611 a Good Processor in 2024?

✅ Pros:
✔ Decent for daily usage (social media, browsing, multitasking)
✔ Good camera support (64 MP)
✔ Power-efficient (10nm design)

❌ Cons:
✘ Weak gaming performance compared to Snapdragon 720G, 730G
✘ No 5G support
✘ Struggles with high-performance tasks

 Conclusion:

Exynos 9611 is a good processor for casual users but NOT ideal for gaming or power users. If you prioritize gaming & performance, Snapdragon 720G, 730G, or MediaTek G90 are better choices.

What do you think of Exynos 9611? Share your thoughts below! 

visit 4 peek tech website